Member-only story
Men just don’t have what it takes to lead. This is satire with a grain of truth.
So, I’ve been reading how canvassers keep hearing from young men that they can’t vote for a woman for president. Really? After nearly 250 years of governments headed by men — and the outcome we see today — how could anyone be comfortable with a man at the helm?
We are on the brink of apocalypse — a situation created by male leaders, care of their chemical imbalances (testosterone) and narcissism, that puts their political careers ahead of the biosphere of the planet.
Let’s face it. Chemistry and culture makes men a questionable choice for someone who has a finger on the nuclear button.
There may be one or two men who have what it takes. But overall, the presidency should not be a man’s job. The job requires the responsible and steady nature of a woman.
Ruth Badar Ginsburg Said It Best
In 2012, asked how many women she’d like to see on the Supreme Court, the late Justice said, without hesitation: “nine.” There was a shocked silence. She noted that for nearly the first 200 years, all of the Justices were men—and nobody was shocked.
Why should we be shocked by nine women serving on the Court, holding all of the seats? Would they…
