Well, I think you are mistaken about what’s possible or more accurately what needs to be possible. Whatever requires large quantities of fossil fuels is incompatible with a habitable planet going forward. 15,000 climate scientists and what is actually happening in the world is evidence of that.

Meanwhile, I have an essay by a non-physicist about physics.

Hmmmm. Who’s more credible?

Don’t get me wrong—I have zero animosity towards you. I believe you are smart and sincere. But I also believe you are mistaken.